Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Biden confronts campus protests; Trump hedges on accepting election results

Kristi Noem just won’t stop talking about killing her dog

Noem’s dog-killing isn’t popular, though Trump supporters are divided

Strangers help Sesame Street puppeteer after heirloom necklace was stolen

Teen grabs wheel when driver passes out and school bus veers into traffic

Cat climbed into Amazon return box, found alive 630 miles away

The new cure-all for vacation excess: the IV drip 

What’s the best bus to New York? We tested 5 for comfort and value.

Adaptive equipment is making national parks more inclusive

The Post endorses April McClain Delaney and Tom Royals for Maryland’s 6th District

On Press Freedom Day, little to celebrate for Hong Kong’s journalists

Young Georgians want to be part of Europe. Their government is in the way.

Ask Amy: My boyfriend just confessed he’s almost $20,000 in debt

Miss Manners: Is it inappropriate to reach out to old girlfriends?

Carolyn Hax: Longtime friend won’t forgive being last-minute canceled for a guy

In a pinch, the Nationals finally find some offense

Is Pastis as good as our food critic thought? He sent spies to find out.

The Capitals, a team in transition, know what they want this offseason

Trump Media auditor charged by SEC with ‘massive fraud’

Google’s empire is massive. A judge will soon rule if it’s a monopoly.

Five tech products we actually like

The New York Times, alone in its outrage over access to Biden

The ‘Access Hollywood’ video cemented Trump’s air of invincibility

Stephen A. Smith would like even more of your attention

Confident of victory over Ukraine, Russia exhibits Western war trophies

Two women are seeking Mexico’s presidency. But the race is about a man.

Hamas in Cairo for hostage talks as Israel briefs aid agencies on Rafah

In photos: At least 39 dead as historic flooding hits southern Brazil

Sea level rise brings new era of dangerous flooding

Michael Cohen keeps broadcasting despite being a witness

Senior executives at the Department of Veterans Affairs overseeing health care programs could appeal disciplinary actions against them only through internal department channels, under a formal proposal the department has sent to Congress.

While other VA executives still could bring appeals to the Merit Systems Protection Board, that adjudicatory agency would have to give more deference to the department’s decisions, under the proposal.

The proposed bill, first reported by <a href="http://www.govexec.com/">the Government Executive site</a>, is the latest in a series arising from the scandal over appointment scheduling and patient care at VA—and is less sweeping than an earlier “discussion draft” from the department.


<i>
    [VA’s carrot-and-stick plan: Raise salaries, limit appeal rights for its executives]
  </i>


A law enacted two years ago in the immediate wake of those disclosures limited the appeal rights for VA’s Senior Executive Service members, the layer between political appointees and mid-level managers. Compared with federal employees in general, they have a shorter notice period and less time to file an appeal. Also, the discipline stands if the hearing officer does not issue a decision overturning it within 21 days, and there is no right of further appeal to the three-member merit board and then into federal court.

Despite those limits, the MSPB—which functions like an internal government court system—recently overturned the department in three highly publicized cases, one a proposed firing and two proposed demotions.

In reaching those decisions, the MSPB applied its general principles for judging whether disciplinary actions are reasonable in light of the circumstances, and noted that the 2014 law barred it from imposing a lesser penalty for VA executives as it can for other employees–leaving an all or nothing choice.


<i>
    [We’re not coddling poorly performing federal employees, appeals agency says]
  </i>


In a cover letter accompanying the latest proposal, the VA Secretary Robert McDonald did not specifically refer to those cases but said the department’s effort to improve service to veterans “is dependent upon the career VA leaders who provide executive level leadership for VA’s health care facilities and programs.

“The VA Secretary needs greater flexibility than current authorities afford him in terms of recruiting, compensating, appraising, and — where necessary – disciplining career health care executives to ensure that VA can operate as a values-based high performance organization rather than a compliance-focused underperforming bureaucracy,” he wrote.

Under the proposal, senior executives responsible for health-care programs—the majority of the roughly 360 senior executives at the department–would be put under a separate body of personnel laws called Title 38 that applies to VA physicians, dentists and other medical professionals. That would allow the department to pay salaries above the SES pay cap, currently $185,100, but also allow appeals of discipline only to internal agency review boards.

The earlier discussion draft would have applied those changes to all VA senior executives.

Meanwhile, other VA executives could continue to appeal to the MSPB but those appeals would be heard directly by the three-member merit board, rather than by a hearing officer. The board would have to issue a decision within 30 days and would have to “defer to agency actions that are supported by substantial evidence, lawful, and within the tolerable bounds of reasonableness,” according to a summary of the impact.

“Substantial evidence” in turn would be defined as what “a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, even though other reasonable persons might disagree.” The measure also would allow the MSPB to reduce the penalty imposed by the department in certain circumstances.

Jason Briefel, acting president of the Senior Executives Association, said that the association is studying the bill. Compared to the earlier draft, “it is certainly an improvement, but we still have concerns,” he said.

However, Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.), chair of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, criticized the proposal for not going far enough. It “enables VA leaders to say they are doing something about the department’s accountability crisis, but it ignores the root of the problem: VA’s inability to effectively, swiftly and fairly discipline all VA employees,” he said in a statement.

The proposal would apply to only about 1 percent of the department’s workforce and “would actually turn what is now a roughly month-long disciplinary process for VA health care senior executives into a process that could take up to 700 days,” he said.

The proposal comes as Congress is working to revamp and update the 2014 law, which addressed numerous issues beyond executive appeals rights.

Changes to legal rights for senior executives could set precedent for similar changes for those VA employees who are not already under Title 38. The House last year passed with bipartisan support a bill to extend many of the 2014 law’s provisions to them, although with longer time limits. The full Senate has not acted on a counterpart bill that passed its veterans committee, however.

The main sponsors, Miller and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), last week urged the Senate panel to include those provisions in any larger bill it produces. In a <a href="http://veterans.house.gov/sites/republicans.veterans.house.gov/files/3-31-2016_Chairman%20Miller%20and%20Senator%20Rubio%20Letter%20to%20Chairman%20Isakson.pdf">letter</a>, they said that “any piece of comprehensive veterans’ legislation that doesn’t provide the VA Secretary swift and comprehensive disciplinary authority for all VA employees misses the true mark on what ails the Department.”

Numerous book-writing awards

One Minute Mysteries: 65 Short Mysteries You Solve with Science

One Minute Mysteries: 65 Short Mysteries You Solve with Math

One Minute Mysteries: 65 More Short Mysteries You Solve with Science

Pennsylvania State University, BA in liberal arts

American University, MA in communications and public affairs

Eric Yoder is a National reporter at The Washington Post. He has reported for The Post since 2000, concentrating on federal employee issues, the budget and government management policies.

Eric Yoder

The Washington Post

The Early

The Technology

The Health

The 202s

prism://prism.query/site,/politics/powerpost&limit=20

The 202s - The Washington Post

PowerPost, by The Washington Post, delivers essential intelligence for D.C. decision-makers.

THE 202s

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/politics&limit=20

2021 Election: Complete coverage and analysis

Politics

Post Politics from The Washington Post is the source for political news headlines, in-depth politics coverage and political opinion, plus breaking news on the biden administration and White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, elections and more.

prism://prism.query/site,/politics/the-fix&limit=6